#Does radio silence make a woman miss you free
When she started to receive the mockery she so richly deserved, she immediately deleted it and that's what Ferris should do - ignore them or play them at their own game.īack in a previous life, when I wrote about music for a living, one of the perks was the amount of free CDs which would pop through the letter box. The other day, some little feminist tweeted that I "needed a slap", so, playing the SJWs at their own game, I claimed this made me feel "unsafe", to which she replied: "A slap doesn't have to be physical or violent." But, like all cosy narratives, it is false. That doesn't fit in with the cosy narrative that women are poor unfortunate victims of nasty phallocrats. The latest Pew research shows that, actually, men are more abused on social media than women and - no great surprise here - the most prolific abusers of women are. Well, that's a simple question which deserves an equally simple answer - yes. You have to ask, 'would a male candidate get this kind of abuse?'" Of course, Ferris was quick to turn this into a gender issue, whining that: "I've had protests outside the office but this is another level. It is, instead, a forum for nutters and bed-wetters and should be treated as such. I have sympathy for anyone who receives threats via social media but people also need to remember that social media isn't real. The latest politician to face the wrath of the keyboard kommandos is Labour's Anne Ferris, who was the victim of the usual Twitter nonsense the other day when someone said she should be "stoned to death". In much the same way that you're not a model until you've had your own stalker, you're not really a politician until you've had some gobdaw threaten you on Twitter. Twitter abuse? Remember, social media isn't real. It's none of their business, but that's what Official Ireland does - stick its beak where it doesn't belong. People are smart - certainly smarter than these eejits - and we don't need a bunch of unelectable bureaucrats dictating the terms of political engagement. Similarly, the BAI can enforce a pointless and indefensible ban on election coverage and all it does it remind us that the quango is not fit for purpose. You can angrily shout at the waves lapping on the shore but that doesn't stop the tide from coming in. It's a bit like the now defunct position of Irish film censor. After all, there is no such prohibition on print media, and social media has been as mad and frenzied as ever. They're quango people - different and inferior to the rest of us in every way possible.Īpart from anything else, the moratorium proves that Official Ireland hasn't a bull's notion about the real world. It's up their with "contemplation" as words that normal people simply don't use.īut these aren't normal people. The prohibition of electioneering and references to election issues will allow voters a period for reflection in the final stages of the election campaign."įor starters, only mad people and priests use words like "reflection". Well, according to chairman of the BAI, Michael O'Keeffe: "The moratorium remains an important measure for ensuring that fairness is achieved by the broadcast media prior to, and during, the period when citizens cast their ballot. In fact, proving that the BAI knows so much more than you do, their regulations on this issue stress that: "Radio and television broadcasters will not be permitted to carry any content that relates directly to General Election issues, including material pertaining to the merits or otherwise of General Election candidates."Īnd why are broadcasters not allowed to discuss the one thing that the entire country is talking about? The brains trust at the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland are never slow to provide us with examples of their essential pointlessness and they have excelled themselves with this ridiculous blanket ban.
There are two questions which immediately spring to mind - who comes up with this nonsense and why do we tolerate it? We're one of the few countries in the civilised world where the broadcast media is forced to introduce a moratorium on their election coverage slap bang in the middle of those precious few hours when politicians are busy trying to hoover up those last few undecided voters.
No, the literal radio silence that has surrounded the election for the last 24 hours is the result of yet another piece of State interference in something that has absolutely nothing to do with them. Sadly for me, but luckily for them, that's not the case. Had I suddenly - and finally, after years of yearning - developed some super power that would make Irish broadcasters conform to my every whim? What the hell just happened? Did I miss a meeting? There I was, giving out about the wall-to-wall, 24/7 election coverage and made a simple remark that I wished they would stop talking about the election on the radio and telly and.
0 kommentar(er)
